On 04/09/14 07:54, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
>On Thursday 04 September 2014 05:24:38 Rutledge Shawn wrote: >> It doesn't necessarily occur to an English speaker to identify >>translatable >> strings and wrap them in tr(), either. It is some work already to try >>to >> support localization, so we are talking about people who are aware >>enough >> to think about supporting it. But if we were using enum keys instead of >> string-string lookup, it would be more efficient and would also >>encourage >> separation of content from the means of displaying it. > >Using identifiers is usually a bad idea. Every single >internationalisation >solution I've seen has migrated away from that. Agree with Thiago. Identifiers are not something I want to encourage. The only reason we have some support for those in Qt is legacy. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
