On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:53:42PM +0200, Adam Strzelecki wrote: > > It looks like we have to leave this to to the deployment solution > > (macdeployqt does not deploy the file). > > I understand, however then we get frameworks that cannot be code-signed if > copied just straight from the folder just because this single .prl file. > well, morten's point was that you wouldn't (or at least shouldn't) do that anyway (you should remove Headers).
> Can you please share some details why this can be problematic to move .prl > files one level up? > > There are already .la files there, so accompanying .prl there will be even > more consistent. > well, i can buy that argument. "the filesystem layout is not very mac-like anyway". patches welcome. note that prls still need to be found at the old place. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
