On 9 January 2015 at 20:19, André Pönitz <apoen...@t-online.de> wrote: > > C++ 'nullptr' only gives a benefit over '0' in the rare cases where it > helps for disambiguation. I would not really like a policy encouraging > 'nullptr' when '0' is just fine, but at least that would be tolerable.
Not only that, compilers are starting to complain about 0 used in place of NULL / nullptr, for instance GCC under -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant. -- Giuseppe D'Angelo _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
