Thiago Macieira wrote: > So, yes, qtchooser is the next best thing. But you're refusing to adhere > to the common way. Fair enough, I'll just recommend anyone using Fedora > packages in #qt to go to #fedora, since you're refusing to standardise...
qtchooser is available in fedora, but is opt-in. If users want it, they can install it. The proposal to install qtchooser by default was denied, by a large margin by the fedora kde-sig development team (I think I may have be the sole proponent), due in large part to the issues Kevin raises. That said, Kevin was the the most vocal in opposition, so take what he says with that in mind... ie, his statements are his alone, and don't necessarily speak for fedora as a whole. -- Rex _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
