On Thursday 12 February 2015 01:18:47 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Thursday 12 February 2015, Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Thursday 12 February 2015 00:18:28 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > > On Wednesday 11 February 2015, Marc Mutz wrote: > > > > If long double was any useful (apparently it's no larger than double > > > > on > > > > Windows), we could use that, but as it stands, that would be > > > > pointless. > > > > > > Apropos, the usefulness of extended precision floating point happens to > > > be that they can represent both 64bit integers and 64bit floating point. > > > > ...except if it cannot. That would've actually made for a good requirement > > for a long double type: be a superset of values representable in double > > and long long. > > > > But that's not what the standard says :( > > I was referring to x87's 80bit floating point.
We don't want to use that. However, the in-memory format for QJsonValue could store a 64-bit int. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
