On Friday 20 February 2015 15:24:04 Mark Gaiser wrote: > I've read about this range-based-for stuff before and there was this paper > [1] that apparently wants to introduce the next generation of it. It would > introduce the syntax (WITHOUT auto!): > for (elem : range) > > Which would be exactly the same as: > for (auto&& elem : range) > > Now i wonder, even if that paper is accepted, would it solve the issue for > the Qt containers when that syntax would be used on them?
No, it's just syntactic sugar. No change in effects. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development