On Friday 27 February 2015 19:40:51 Gunnar Roth wrote: > Hi Thiago, > should i just take your word or do you also have a link for this?
https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-4-Clause-UC ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change > the requirement to document this is also more than qt company tells > commercial customers. they they if you use modules which are under > commrcial license as qtcore pretends to be, you can be silent about > anything used in there. There's a page in the Qt documentation that lists all the documentation requirements. > The Digia legal counsel Topi Ruotsalainen tells in > https://devdays.kdab.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/Qt_license_options_FINAL_2 > 0121114.pdf page 14 > > Qt Commercial can be used „silently‟ to create products ● No need to mention > in documentation, end-user license, to provide source code etc. that LGPL > requires Because it's not LGPL requirement. You still have to observe the BSD 2- and 3-clause requirement to reproduce the copyright notice. > Well that then seems to not be true… > > Regards, > Gunnar > > Ps.: And then there is also the modified freetype code in qtgui’s raster > code which also has the freetype license and one need to mention freetype > in your documentation, even if you don’t use the 3rdparte ferrotype lib > provided by qt ( on windows you don’t need this for example ) -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
