> Note that we're talking about a standard violation in the first place. The > standard says you can replace operator new, so if MSVC doesn't allow you to do > it properly, then you can throw the standard out of the window. If an inline > operator new (for MSVC only) solved the problem, it would be ok.
As in, you'd be ok with individuals locally hacking Qt to work this way, or as in you'd be ok with including a mechanism in a future version of Qt to replace new and delete that (on Windows only) used this methodology? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
