Good point :) I was under the assumption that the concepts are too different, but if they aren't then maybe a joint module would make sense.
Simon Original Message From: Thiago Macieira Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 17:06 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] New Module for Serial Buses On Tuesday 26 May 2015 15:47:04 Simon Hausmann wrote: > My first suggestion is to give the module a better name. "Bus" is an > overloaded term with many meanings and it is IMO too close to our "DBus" > module. Why not go with what your first sentence in the email used: > > "We’d like to create a new Qt module for serial buses" > > Call it the Qt module for accessing serial buses, QtSerialBus :) Agreed, but why can't this be an extension of QtSerialPort? QtSerialPort is not about just 9-pin connectors and UART, since it does support serial over USB too. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development