On Friday 05 June 2015 21:45:37 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > As asked in the bug report below: is it necessary to handle this situation > with an assert/abort, instead of simply returning (with whatever error the > void function in question can return)?
The assert is inside HB, so it's not our choice. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
