On 06/06/15 15:26, 
"development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany....@qt-project.org on behalf of 
Thiago Macieira" 
<development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany....@qt-project.org on behalf of 
thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:

>On Saturday 06 June 2015 14:22:20 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>> Il 06/06/2015 13:27, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
>> > Then why do we need them in QSslSocket?
>> 
>> Technically they are be needed there, indeed, but I didn't want to cause
>> an API asymmetry with the other functions for ciphers, certificates and
>> so on, that's all.
>
>The symmetry only existed because we added them to QSslSocket before 
>QSslCertificate existed.
>
>I'd rather new API existed only in QSslConfiguration. That way, we don't need 
>to duplicate in QSslSocket.

In that case you should probably also deprecate the methods in QSslSocket.

Cheers,
Lars

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to