Puh i this is a recurrent topic...
Ok in https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/113276/ says Björn Breitmayer "That explains why the SDK that was generated with Visual Studio 2012 ship a 2013 compiler" I have no clue how that could happen.
How should an sdk created by a vs2012 include a vs2013 compiler? Addionally, the compiler is always taken ( to my knowledge) from the wince800 tree installed by platfrombuilder installation and that is an v17.00 compiler ( which has an earlier subversion than the vs2012 compiler actually), so the compiler is never taken from the ide. This was confirmed last week by microsoft to us. But please share your additionall knowledge with us, we would be very thankful.
regards,
Gunnar
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2015 um 08:45 Uhr
Von: "Kalinowski Maurice" <maurice.kalinow...@theqtcompany.com>
An: "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>, "development@qt-project.org" <development@qt-project.org>
Betreff: Re: [Development] QtCS: Long Term Release discussion
Von: "Kalinowski Maurice" <maurice.kalinow...@theqtcompany.com>
An: "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>, "development@qt-project.org" <development@qt-project.org>
Betreff: Re: [Development] QtCS: Long Term Release discussion
> On Thursday 18 June 2015 08:23:52 Gunnar Roth wrote:
> > > Am 17.06.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Thiago Macieira
> > > <thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 19:30:25 Gunnar Roth wrote:
> > >> Yes that would make us (as a commercial user using a self made
> > >> port of qt
> > >> 5.4.1 to wec2013 ) very unhappy. This means 5.6 will be the last
> > >> version
> > >> wec2013 would be supported and you would go straight to making a
> > >> back port very hard or even impossible.
> > >
> > > WEC 2013 was never considered deprecated. The deprecation applies to
> > > WEC 7 only.
> >
> > Well ok, but how does Lars Knoll’s sentence "we could make
> > VS2013 the compiler baseline for 5.7.“ fit into this? As the only
> > supported compiler for wec2013 is a cl with v 17.00 aka vs2012.
>
> Apparently VS2013 can also be used for WEC2013.
[Kalinowski Maurice]
Correct, check the discussion here: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/113276/
As a summary, SDK makers / board vendors can select to include the VS2013 compiler into their package even though the IDE is VS2012 based. However, that puts quite some requirement on the vendor side and that needs to be evaluated.
Maurice
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> > > Am 17.06.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Thiago Macieira
> > > <thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 19:30:25 Gunnar Roth wrote:
> > >> Yes that would make us (as a commercial user using a self made
> > >> port of qt
> > >> 5.4.1 to wec2013 ) very unhappy. This means 5.6 will be the last
> > >> version
> > >> wec2013 would be supported and you would go straight to making a
> > >> back port very hard or even impossible.
> > >
> > > WEC 2013 was never considered deprecated. The deprecation applies to
> > > WEC 7 only.
> >
> > Well ok, but how does Lars Knoll’s sentence "we could make
> > VS2013 the compiler baseline for 5.7.“ fit into this? As the only
> > supported compiler for wec2013 is a cl with v 17.00 aka vs2012.
>
> Apparently VS2013 can also be used for WEC2013.
[Kalinowski Maurice]
Correct, check the discussion here: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/113276/
As a summary, SDK makers / board vendors can select to include the VS2013 compiler into their package even though the IDE is VS2012 based. However, that puts quite some requirement on the vendor side and that needs to be evaluated.
Maurice
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
