On Tuesday 23 June 2015 15:12:36 Mike Krus wrote: > Hi > > while investigating crashes in QAtomicInteger<quint64> on iOS, I was > wondering why the default is not the use the C++11 implementation if it’s > available? In particular, in qbasicatomic.h, the asm-based implementations > are preferred for all arm platforms (and others). Shouldn’t the version > using std::atomic be preferred?
Doing so would be binary incompatible. (Contested) rationale here: https://codereview.qt-project.org/103848 -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
