Sune Vuorela schreef op 12-7-2015 om 20:37:
> On 2015-07-12, Andre Somers <an...@familiesomers.nl> wrote:
>> become easier to make the transition in user code? Then, if Qt itself
>> changes its API in Qt 6 to use QVector instead of QList, the users' code
>> will just work :-)
> In Qt6, QList can be fixed. The issue is what to do until then.
Fixed how? To become QVector? In that case, just use QVector instead. I 
could imagine a QVector like container that can reserve some space at 
both ends in order to allow for fast prepending (or use the end of the 
reserved range for that, perhaps). But other than that, what quality 
from QList would you like to keep over QVector?

André

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to