On Friday 24 July 2015 20:23:45 Marc Mutz wrote: > Fair enough, but seeing all the commits flying by that add Q_D_O to "fix > warnings with clang", it's not hard to imagine that a) the problem will > solve itself by a grass roots movement and b) people will a > not-too-unrealistic future warning will complain not just about > inconsistent use, but any missing override, like the already-existing > warnings for nullptr. So if 5.6 is anything near 4.8, we'll probably add > those macros to a point release, by popular demand.
I think it's worth it if there's a benefit in performance or in reduction of warnings. Doing it for the sake of doing it, not so much. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
