On Saturday, August 22, 2015 10:47:42 AM Sze Howe Koh wrote: > Hi, > > On 20 August 2015 at 15:31, Frederik Gladhorn > > <frederik.gladh...@theqtcompany.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > To make dealing with Enginio a bit easier (I get asked for the right > > version number for each release and keep being confused myself since it > > doesn't see much activity), I will change the future branch names and > > version number. > > > > As you know we cannot change the major version as that is not binary > > compatible, so the major .so version will stay at 1. But we can align the > > rest of the version to Qt release versions. > > > > Branches: > > follow Qt branches: 5.6, 5.6.0, etc > > > > Version numbers: > > follow Qt in minor and patch: 1.6.0 will be released with Qt 5.6.0. > > What do you think of applying this system to the Qt Quick related > modules too? See https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_5_Structure -- the current set > of version numbers is rather chaotic.
I personally agree, but there seem many people pulling in many directions, so I'm not sure I'd want to start the bike shed here and now. Cheers, Frederik > > > Regards, > Sze-Howe _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
