>>> Did I simply hit a "feature" Qt won't ever encounter because it >>> doesn't use C (nor va_arg)?
is what I was referring back to when I said: >> Well, it's nice to hear we don't use var-args. Perhaps I misunderstood ! I'm relatively new to Qt myself. On grep-ing code, I see we do in fact use var-args in some places. I do think it is prudent to keep var-args usage to a minimum, though. >>[...] overloading-by-signature: passing 0 might not >> get you the overload that has a pointer as that parameter, [...] > I think I've already run into situations where the compiler > protected me from that situation by detecting the ambiguity, I'm not convinced I want to rely on that. Some compilers might be better at it than others ... Eddy. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development