On Tuesday 05 January 2016 15:37:51 Marc Mutz wrote: > On Tuesday 05 January 2016 12:56:55 Ulf Hermann wrote: > > avoid paying the price of constructing a QStringList if they are unused. > > That's what I was wondering about: constructing a QStringList is just a copy > of a pointer, and while not totally free, it is next to nothing compared to > the additional heap allocation of a new'ed QStringList...
It's still a good enough trade-off, considering we'd need to keep a bool elsewhere. > (we need std::optional :) Aye. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
