On 18/03/16 16:44, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" <development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany....@qt-project.org on behalf of thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
>On sexta-feira, 18 de março de 2016 10:46:41 PDT Koehne Kai wrote: >> > It remains that this document is expected to be quite stable, so there >> > would be some sense to having a stable URL to which we routinely copy the >> > new version once a change to the source has been accepted. The effort >> > involved would be minor, I must suppose. >> >> We'd avoid this problem if we put it into a repository that doesn't follow >> the Qt branching model. > >I'd say we *want* it to follow the branching model, so that we can keep it >linked to the version in which it applies. Maybe I'm saying this only because >of the current circumstances, as the policy for 5.6 differs quite a lot from >5.7. +1. Things do evolve, and I've seen issues whenever we tried to define such things independent of the Qt version. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
