I'm not sure what you'd like me to answer at this point. I think that it is possible to fix the build of these modules, the CI system is in place for that. However it requires a fair bit of work (ask Robin about qtmessagingframework ;-).
However fixing the modules appears to me to be orthogonal to the question about whether they should be mentioned in .gitmodules or not. It is my opinion that them being listed in the file does not cause any harm because they have the status "ignore", which excludes them from init-repository, the CI system and consequently the release of Qt. Simon ________________________________________ From: Development <development-bounces+simon.hausmann=theqtcompany....@qt-project.org> on behalf of Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 10:38 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] qtfeedback and qtdocgallery: status? On Tuesday 22 March 2016 09:58:48 Hausmann Simon wrote: > As the modules are not part of any release of Qt and unmaintained, I don't > think they need fixing. C'mon — FTBFS without the possibility to submit a fix? -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
