On terça-feira, 31 de maio de 2016 09:45:40 BRT Olivier Goffart wrote: > > the next idea would be implementing moc inside the compiler itself, > > which is possible with at least clang and gcc nowadays. > > > > the last idea is doing away with moc entirely, at the cost of somewhat > > uglier macros, and actually working c++11/14 support in the compiler. > > > > "incidentally", olivier has more-or-less working solutions based on the > > latter two ideas. > > Which impose many more requirements on the compilers. And we support many > more compiler in Qt.
I don't see us dropping the current moc until at least Qt 7 or when Microsoft Visual Studio is no longer relevant. I think we should provide moc-ng as an optional dependency, but neither bundled with Qt nor a requirement to build Qt or a user's project. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development