On segunda-feira, 27 de junho de 2016 07:18:02 PDT Tuukka Turunen wrote: > In general, it is valuable to be able to make releases quickly to fix e.g. a > security vulnerability. The fastest way to do it is to push the needed > change (or changes) into the release branch, and create new release > directly from there. I do not have any strong opinion if the number of the > release should be x.y.z.1 , x.y.z-1 or even x.y.(z+1). Earlier the notation > has been -1, but if there is desire to change it going forward, I do not > think that is a problem.
Correction, no, there was no earlier notation because we've never done this before. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
