On sexta-feira, 1 de julho de 2016 18:31:17 PDT Rafael Roquetto wrote: > Of course, all this assumes the introduction of a QtStl namespace to be a > feasible task. Whether it really is I cannot say.
I'd say we start with it in a private header, add classes to it as needed. If we're happy with it, then we can consider making it public, later. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
