Sometimes I am listed as a reviewer for a code change in Qt that also involves documentation changes. The code change is sometimes outside my expertise, but I assume I have been included to approve the documentation changes. I always give +1 in such cases. Is that correct?
martin ________________________________ From: Development <development-bounces+martin.smith=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenha...@qt.io> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 11:08:07 AM To: development@qt-project.org; qt-crea...@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] [FYI] commit/review policy refactored just a heads-up that i (finally) split off the review policy from the commit policy. see https://wiki.qt.io/Review_Policy . if you have suggestions for improvement, please discuss them upfront on irc. you're expected to read the document even if you're not interested in actively improving it any time soon. ;) _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
