@ Thiago, >The one you linked to is P2 - Important. It's neither critical nor showstopper.
It isn't I did the decision about assigning the P2 status. I personally would establish P0/P1 if it would make sense (but, it is just "empty work" which won't change anything). Since many bugs with P1 statuses still are not considered. > It's not critical, according to whoever triaged it. If the AVI video playback shows with 0.5-1 FPS then it is not critical for you? Then it is strange for me... o_O > Where's your proof? My proof - it is a BUG tracker and current QtMM status. @ Kai, > I think Denis should end this e-mail thread by apologizing, and start a new one in a reasonable way. I do not consider myself as the guilty person and I have nothing to apologize. BR, Denis 2016-07-21 10:41 GMT+03:00 Kai Koehne <kai.koe...@qt.io>: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > > [...] > > So while I agree that angriness is not helpful for mail list ... > messages like this > > are probably the seed to rethink strategy of working with bugs. > > Somewhat a side remark, but the unfortunate consequence of this thinking is > that the objectively best way to get a lot of Qt developers interested in > your > problem is to write e-mails that breach of etiquette (to put it mildly). > > If Denis would have written a reasonable e-mail asking about the status of > Qt > Multimedia (without insults, attacks, and wishing anyone to hell), we most > probably won't have this discussion. > > > > I think Denis should end this e-mail thread by apologizing, and start a > new one > in a reasonable way. > > Just my 2 cents, > > Kai > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development