On fredag 12. august 2016 10.52.52 CEST Marc Mutz wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to know what the rules are supposed to for submitting to 5.6 (LTS). > > Should we enforce the strict rules of other minor releases (only regressions > and P2+)? I strongly believe that autotests improvements should go to LTS, flaky and broken tests affect all branches. Cheers, Jędrek _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
- Re: [Development] Which changes are suitable for... Olivier Goffart
- Re: [Development] Which changes are suitabl... Lars Knoll
- Re: [Development] Which changes are sui... Marc Mutz
- Re: [Development] Which changes are... Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Which changes... Olivier Goffart
- Re: [Development] Which ch... Marc Mutz
- Re: [Development] Whic... Olivier Goffart
- Re: [Development] Whic... Marc Mutz
- Re: [Development] Whic... Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)
- Re: [Development] Whic... Tuukka Turunen
- Re: [Development] Which changes are suitable for... Jędrzej Nowacki
- Re: [Development] Which changes are suitable for... Gunnar Roth
- Re: [Development] Which changes are suitabl... Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Which changes are sui... Gunnar Roth
- Re: [Development] Which changes are... Thiago Macieira
- Re: [Development] Which changes... Gunnar Roth
- Re: [Development] Which ch... Thiago Macieira