On 2016-09-05, Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com> wrote: >> * C++ ABI >> * libstdc++ still breaking compatibility in std::function >> * not now, revisit in a year or two > > There hasn't been time to discuss this at QtCon, but I'd say we should > not spend another year before revisiting this at the next QtCS: do we > really care about C++ ABI compatibility? What other C++ libraries are > doing this? Do users really expect to swap out standard library
one of the problems is that libstdc++ broke the abi between 4.9 and 5.0 for std::function without any compatibility things like for the other ones, because c++11 was only "experimental" until then. And I think that std::function is maybe the primary candidate for a thing we want to use. /Sune _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
