Il 03/10/2016 23:28, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: > Maybe "lts" is better because we can then reuse the project for the next LTS, > whenever that happens.
Given the number of branches that other projects have, I don't think it's going to be a problem in the future to create or destroy new branches. I'm going with "lts" and "dev" anyhow, thanks! Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company | Tel: UK +44-1625-809908 KDAB - Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
