Louai Al-Khanji said: > this is not a bureaucratization process. It is about having a way to document the final conclusions of discussions we already have. In the process, it shall also force us to be explicit and leave fewer dangling ambiguities, where different parties have subtly different interpretations, because the final QUIP shall be one document, rather than a scattered mess of correspondence spread across several months of a mailing list archive, with references back to earlier discussions relating to similar topics. Newcomers shall only have one place to look to get up to speed.
(I should note, though, that this *is* a bureaucratization process; it's just that it's *the good kind* - yes, those do exist. Bureaucracy may have spawned some heinous and easily-noticed messes; but it's actually a technology - an information technology, no less - that helped revolutionise the way the world was run (roughly a quarter millennium ago) and usher in the modern era.) I'll third the motion that we should start a repo for QUIPs, Eddy. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development