On Saturday 19 November 2016 22:30:51 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em sábado, 19 de novembro de 2016, às 19:57:57 PST, Marc Mutz escreveu: > > You see, this is a perfect example of why we _don't_. > > > > > > > > (Some parts of) KF5 use boost and STL in the API (ever since KDE 4 or > > even 3). It hasn't been a problem for KDE to keep BC guarantees > > comparable to what Qt does. What makes you think that Qt would be any > > different? > > Those parts of KDE don't keep BC guarantees. Distros have to rebuild > everything when their dependencies change.
I wonder why we used d-pointers and virtual_hook in, say, libkdepim if it doesn't guarantee BC... -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
