On Tuesday 22 November 2016, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 22 de novembro de 2016 19:21:40 PST Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > > * pros: > > ** You can use Qt compiled against either libc++ or libstdc++, with > > "the other one", without recompiling Qt. > > > > * subjective cons: > > ** apart from Qt, noone does that, why should Qt be special in that > > regard? ** is there anyone really using this feature? > > And that's why we couldn't make the decision: we don't know. > > macOS seems to have settled on libc++, but now many Linux distributions are > providing it too. The question is whether long-term people will want this > on Linux or not (Android included). > > Right now, since none of the distributions shipping libc++ are doing it > right, you cannot use "the other one" without recompiling Qt anyway. If > this way of building will remain, then we don't have a problem.
Can't we statically link to it, so that it doesn't matter which version the application is using? `Allan _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development