Den 23-11-2016 kl. 23:10 skrev Thiago Macieira:
On quarta-feira, 23 de novembro de 2016 21:14:52 PST Simon Everts wrote:
That is not relevant here. I am using Windows 10 (64-bit) but I am still
forced (because of 3rt-party-libraries) to develop 32-bit-Qt-applications.
Even if the operating system is 64-bit there can be a lot of 32-bit
application, e.g. VS 2013 and VS 2015 are still 32-bit applications.
+1
As a machine manufacturer we are still deploying 32bit windows systems
because of this reason. We'll be on 64bit windows soon, but need to support
the 32bit systems for at least 5 years. A lot of industrial computer
suppliers still install 32bit images on computers because there aren't any
64bit drivers available for the hardware.
Good, thanks for the information, Simon and Helmut.
I know the sample size here is horrible, but in your opinion what compiler
should we keep offering a 32-bit binary build for?
MSVC 2013
MSVC 2015
MinGW
The reason for doing 32 bit MSVC releasees is 3rd party libraries. Is
that a valid reason for MinGW? I would have thought that the guys using
it pretty much have to compile everything themselves anyway.
I don't know, though. I won't ever use MinGW myself unless a customer
forces me to.
Bo Thorsen,
Director, Viking Software.
--
Viking Software
Qt and C++ developers for hire
http://www.vikingsoft.eu
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
