On 2016-12-09 16:23, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em sexta-feira, 9 de dezembro de 2016, às 15:28:13 PST, Matthew Woehlke > escreveu: >> I can work around that, though it's obnoxious. I'm more concerned about >> not being able to tinker with the CLI arguments before Qt gets them. > > That's a valid concern, but not one that warrants a QApplication subclass.
Right; that one is an issue if the user is no longer in control of instantiating the Q*Application instance. -- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
