> -----Original Message-----
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Stottlemyer,
> Brett (B.S.)
> Sent: torstaina 12. tammikuuta 2017 3.19
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Switch Qt Remote Objects to a Tech Preview for
> Qt 5.9
>
> On 1/11/17, 11:50 AM, "Development on behalf of Oswald Buddenhagen"
> <development-bounces+bstottle=ford....@qt-project.org on behalf of
> oswald.buddenha...@qt.io> wrote:
>
>
>
> >also, i don't think we've been bothering a lot about deadlines for TP
> >modules, so who cares.
>
> Apparently Tuukka does, since he’s suggesting holding off until 5.10...
>
> >it doesn't help that you apparently haven't even explored the prior art
> >within qt even though it was pointed out to you two years ago already.
>
Yes, when it comes to being part of a "release train" the cargo needs to be in
decent shape when the trains leaves the station.
I would like to emphasize that I have nothing against this module being part of
Qt 5.9 as a TP - as long as it is in such shape that causes no harm to the Qt
5.9 release schedule.
Many of the delays we have had with previous Qt 5 releases have been partially
caused by not being ready at the FF time.
Yours,
Tuukka
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
