> On 16 Jan 2017, at 16:24, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:37:06PM +0000, J-P Nurmi wrote: >> Early feedback from the CI system would be invaluable. >> > note that nowadays you can explicitly schedule CI runs on arbitrary > pending changes. > of course, that's not the only _possible_ reason for wanting a branch, > but if it's the only _actual_ reason, then it may make sense to change > the plan.
I’m expecting the refactoring work to generate quite a large amount of commits. I’d prefer to do it in small steps to reduce the risk of breaking things. This would be a throw-away branch. No merging to the mainline, but ready features would be picked by hand and submitted for review. -- J-P Nurmi _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
