> On 07 Feb 2017, at 11:29, Edward Welbourne <edward.welbou...@qt.io> wrote: > > Sergio Martins (6 February 2017 17:11) quoted >> https://wiki.qt.io/The_Qt_Governance_Model kind of implies you can't >> be a maintainer if you're not an approver. >> "How to become a Maintainer: An Approver who (...), may be nomiated >> (...)" > > However, the next paragraph adds "A Maintainer may also nominate a new > Maintainer to take ownership of a subset of his / her component" without > any mention of the new Maintainer being an Approver. > > Subsequent discussion appears to have concluded (quoting Thiago): > > Becoming maintainer of anything in a main module implies becoming > Approver everywhere, if one is not so yet. > > Should I update that wiki page ? > Should we, in fact, turn it into a QUIP ?
The way we have been drawing our governance model as a pyramid had always implied this for me. But I can see that it’s not explicitly mentioned in the wiki page. Let's add a sentence to the wiki page for the maintainers section. And yes, it would be good to turn the governance model into a QUIP :) Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
