18.02.2017, 22:13, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 06:36:07 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote: >> Keeping 5.9.0 on schedule even while 5.8.0 blows past its planned release >> date would seem to be appropriate when you have the capability to >> concurrently maintain two minor (not patchlevel) release branches. > > That's exactly what Tuukka proposed we do. We keep 5.9.0 on schedule and, > because of that, 5.8.1 becomes impossible and unnecessary.
So people who cannot upgrade to 5.8.0 because of bugs would have to wait for 5.9.0 and hope that there will be no other regressions. Great. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
