Op 07/03/2017 om 22:43 schreef Richard Moore:
>
>
>     You're right. My wording above was misleading, I wasn't present
>     myself. This is what I remembered people telling me afterwards.
>
>     Here are the session
>     notes: https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_build_systems_at_QtCon_2016
>     <https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_build_systems_at_QtCon_2016>
>
>
> ​Yep, there's also a video. My recollection is that there was a small
> vocal group of people pushing qbs, but that they couldn't demonstrate
> any actual advantages it had. They offered a few up, but it turned out
> that people had already done that using other tools such as cmake. ​I
> think the only conclusion was that qmake is weak and that the
> maintainers want to stop maintaining it.
>
The stopping maintainance of qmake can't happen any time soon I'd think.
Not even from Qt6. There are too many Qt projects out there depending on
it.

André
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to