On 23 March 2017 at 11:36, Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> wrote: > That said, there's a reason why there's no std::sort(Container &). It's > because you need Concepts to disambiguate the various overloads. Well, that > and because Eric Niebler doesn't manage to limit the scope of his range > proposals.
The TS proposal is quite tightly scoped. It doesn't have range views and range actions, for instance. > matters whether a function is a member or a free function. There're proposals > floating around for years to make o.f() fall back to f(o) for std C++. Ville > can probably say more about the status of these. This is a problem that can be That proposal was rejected, whether it will come back in some form is for the moment unknown. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development