Hi, To me this appears to be comparing the questions that new learning programmers have with questions of seasoned C++ programmers. I understand that we should cater both with Qt, but the topic at this point of the thread is the former group, not the latter.
Simon > On 31. Mar 2017, at 08:41, Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> wrote: > >> On Thursday 30 March 2017 22:32:35 Alejandro Exojo wrote: >>> On Wednesday 29 March 2017 20:11:58 Marc Mutz wrote: >>> I would really, really >>> like to know why QVector is easier to use? Because it has indexOf()? >>> Seriously, now? >> >> Because it has _lots_ of easy to use member functions, and another kind of >> iterator that is also easier to use for some, and good documentation. I'm >> not making this stuff up: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/571394/ > > Oh, I can play this game, too: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16559655/ > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38262041/ > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10153658/ > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35811053/ > >> Hundreds of votes for something immensely simple, that with Qt containers >> is also immensely more readable. Ease of use has a lot more value than >> performance to many people. A thought: how many comments did get the blog >> post that you did on making QRegion iterable? And how many the one about >> the removal of the foreach macro? > > -- > Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer > KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company > Tel: +49-30-521325470 > KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development