Hi all, We have a draft policy for lambdas at [0], in a section that begins with
Note: This section is not an accepted convention yet. This section serves as baseline for further discussions. That section is now a quarter decade old; it's had a few updates since it was added (2015-02-27), so may fairly be said to be evolving (albeit it's had more formatting changes than substantive ones); but perhaps it's about time we agreed that at least its low-level bits about formatting can be promoted to [1], without such a caveat. * [0] https://wiki.qt.io/Coding_Conventions#Conventions_for_C.2B.2B11_usage * [1] https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Coding_Style#Braces In particular, I'd like to (at least) amend the first exception in [1], Function implementations and class declarations always have the left brace on the start of a line: to include "(but not lambdas)" in a judicious place, so that lambdas are excluded from the exception and fit into our general pattern, putting the open-brace on the same line as its controlling preamble: e.g. Function implementations (but not lambdas) and class declarations always have the left brace on the start of a line: Does anyone object to this minimal change ? (How long do I have to wait before I can claim lazy consensus ?) Eddy. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development