On Saturday, 9 September 2017 05:46:49 -03 Sean Harmer wrote: > Does anybody have any plans to add such a facility? Or is there some > other facility to avoid operator new here for both the QSP and the > object itself?
There are no plans. We don't have allocators anywhere in Qt, so I doubt this will ever happen. > The QSharedPointers are used in the public API as we can't use > std::shared_ptr there. I guess the closest I can get without such a > facility is to maintain a pool of QSharedPointers, a pool of the objects > and use QSharedPointer::reset() when recycling or just keep the two pools > in sync whcih I guess makes sense anyway. That won't help: inline void reset(T *t) { QSharedPointer copy(t); swap(copy); } Have you benchmarked and found out that the malloc() for the QtSharedPointer::ExternalRefCountData pointer is the culprit? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development