Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > You do know what a thread is - right? ;-)
Yeah, my momma taught me long ago ;) > Sorry, I'm too lazy/busy to read the source right now to make sure that no > signal handlers are used here. No problem, it was just curiosity. > Apart from this I'd suspect you will still get the SEGV if you do not block > - even if the frequency changes. This points to you using some kind of > pointer that is not properly controlled (e.g. sending a signal to a QFSW > that is already deleted). I think it was false alarm. I used a lambda expression as slot and must have misunderstood why the other lambdas in the same function can use '[&]' without ending up with invalid references in the body. I only need the watcher instance, so I'm just passing the reference to it explicitly. No more crashing and less ambiguous anyway :) _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
