On quarta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2017 05:23:04 PDT Иван Комиссаров wrote: > Sorry for digging the thread, but how is > * use qssize_t > and > ** Wrapping std::{unordered_}map may be acceptable > combines? > std::*map uses size_t in it's API (size, max_size, count, reserve, > begin(size_type), end(size_type))
Our wrapper API can still use qssize_t. "Won't that limit the actual maximum size?" No, not really, since it's already limited to half the full VM space. No object can be larger than that. Using unsigned is unnecessary. > And offtop - what about allocators? They would be accesibble for wrappers, > but not accesible for QVector/QString? They wouldn't be accessible for wrappers either. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development