On Sunday 14 January 2018 17:49:48 Adrien LERAVAT wrote: > In that case, the QCoapReply life is managed with a > QSharedPointer<QCoapReply> in the request. > > QCoapRequest does not inherit from QObject. Anyone sees a problem with this > approach?
The API sounds interesting, but it's a departure of what we are used in QNAM. What happened to the idea of using a setter on the manager, for making the replies self-delete if wanted? (it was mentioned on the QtCS) That had the advantage that can be added to QNAM as well, so both can end up having a similar API. -- Viking Software, Qt and C++ developers for hire http://www.vikingsoftware.com _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development