Ok, Then it would be good to get this fixed in Qt 5.9.5. Please remember to do the cherry-pick in '5.9.5', not in '5.9'
br, Jani ________________________________________ From: Alexandr Akulich <akulichalexan...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 10:03 AM To: Jani Heikkinen Cc: development@qt-project.org; releas...@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' ready I thought that it is an old issue (since 5.9 to 5.11) but in fact, it is a regression since change [1] in landed to 5.9.5. I staged the fix for 5.11 ten minutes ago and I will submit the change for 5.9 in two hours. [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/212208/ On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikki...@qt.io> wrote: > Hi! > > Is there a bug report about the issue? If this is nothing new I think we can > wait Qt 5.9.6 for that fix > > br, > Jani > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alexandr Akulich <akulichalexan...@gmail.com> >> Sent: keskiviikko 14. maaliskuuta 2018 16.21 >> To: Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikki...@qt.io> >> Cc: development@qt-project.org; releas...@qt-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' ready >> >> Hi Jani, >> >> Can we please get in a compilation fix for qreal configured as float? >> There is a very small yet critical issue with qMax in QFusionStyle. >> >> I submitted the fix [1] for 5.11 and it is approved, but I agreed to also >> fix the >> same line coding style issue before staging the change. >> >> I will submit the final patch for 5.11 in two hours (as soon as I'll get >> back to my >> ssh keys) and will submit cherry-pick for 5.9 immediately after the original >> patch >> staging. >> >> [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/223101/ >> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikki...@qt.io> wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' is now competed. From now on '5.9' if for >> > Qt >> 5.9.6 and all changes targeted to Qt 5.9.5 release must be done in '5.9.5'. >> And as >> usual no any 'nice-to-haves' in '5.9.5' anymore! >> > >> > We are targeting to get Qt 5.9.5 out as soon as possible (during March) so >> please make sure all release blockers are visible in blocker list >> (https://bugreports.qt.io/issues/?filter=19230) and all release blockers are >> fixed >> immediately. >> > >> > br, >> > Jani >> > ________________________________________ >> > From: Development >> > <development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of >> > Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikki...@qt.io> >> > Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 3:07 PM >> > To: development@qt-project.org >> > Cc: releas...@qt-project.org >> > Subject: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' >> > started >> > >> > Hi! >> > >> > We have soft branched '5.9.5' from '5.9'. Final downmerge from '5.9' to >> > '5.9.5' >> will happen at the beginning of week 11 (most probably Monday 12.3.2018). >> > >> > Please start using '5.9.5' for new changes (cherry-picks from 5.11) >> > targeted to >> Qt 5.9.5 release. And once again: No any 'nice to haves' in '5.9.5' anymore! >> > >> > We are targeting to release Qt 5.9.5 during March. >> > >> > br, >> > Jani >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Development mailing list >> > Development@qt-project.org >> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Development mailing list >> > Development@qt-project.org >> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development