I'd say we add one line for qtbase/Qt Core/Item models in the maintainer wiki. 'Item models' would probably also be the best name for Jira.
Cheers, Lars > On 2 May 2018, at 08:34, Alex Blasche <[email protected]> wrote: > > It was pointed out to me that this vote has come due. The usual response is > to update Jira components and the maintainer wiki. Neither of these have a > category for this. What is the conclusion here? Do we need a new entry in the > wiki and Jira? If so what would be the name for it. > > -- > Alex > > ________________________________________ > From: Development > <[email protected]> on behalf of > Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, 1 April 2018 8:18:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models > > Sérgio Martins wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David >> Faure has been an unofficial maintainer. >> David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is >> someone you'll always want to add as reviewer. >> >> He's well known in the community and already maintains QtXmlPatterns, Qt >> mimetypes and Qt3Support. >> >> Disclaimer: David works with me at KDAB. >> (And if you're wondering if KDAB has any plans for this module, the >> answer is no. In fact I hope it remains low change volume). >> >> >> Finally, a big thanks to the previous maintainer, Stephen Kelly, who did >> a great job, both on Qt and KDE models! > > +1 for David from me too! > > Greetings, > > Steve. > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
