On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 10:31:17 -03 Kai Koehne wrote: > > In your internal infra, use a different repository branched off from the > > public one, containing the licence checker binary and anything else you > > may need. This repository should never be shared. > > Well, the whole point of the exercise is to allow customers to configure Qt > under commercial terms from git, so any non-shared git module doesn't help.
You can then make it public, so long as it's clear it's Qt Company, not Qt Project. I object to it showing up anywhere in github.com/qt and qt- project.org, but other places in qt.io could be acceptable. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
