On Sat, Jul 21, 2018, 07:38 Bogdan Vatra via Development < [email protected]> wrote:
> You really hate QBS don't you ? :) Do you have so few arguments for qbs that you need to appeal to emotions? :) Anyway IMHO is more important to have a clean, nice and easy to use syntax > and > to be tooling friendly than 1.b. > Sure you can write toolable build files with qbs, but there is nothing stopping you writing an unparsable JS mess either. For QML we needed to define a toolable subset of the language with the UI files to have any chance at tooling it. For the qbs dialect of QML that has not been done yet. So I do not consider qbs to be toolable at this point. Best regards, Tobias
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
