> On 16 Aug 2018, at 22:11, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 06:05:35 PDT Arnaud Clère wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Thiago, did you decide on something regarding QCborValue in Qt5.12?
> 
> Hello Arnaud, all
> 
> No, I have not. I have not had the time to read your email yet and nor have I 
> had time to even test if the API I designed does what we discussed in Oslo.
> 
> I will not have time to do any of that before the 5.12 feature freeze.
> 
> So we need a summary decision:
> a) yank it out
> b) leave it as is and damn the torpedoes
> 
> Unless someone can volunteer to test. I *think* my design is slightly better 
> than QJsonValue, so the following should work:
> 
>       value[1]["hello"][32] = false;

That’s great news. I assume it’s also easy to convert from and to JSON, so that 
one could use QCbor as an intermediate data format if one needs to modify JSON 
In place and write it out again?

Tor Arne 
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to